Mary Shelley was evidently a prophet of the first order. Shelley, when she wrote her novel, Frankenstein (The Modern Prometheus), evidently had a premonition that man would, someday in the future, become so self-obsessed, so narcissistic, that he would eventually end up destroying himself. Perhaps Shelley had heard the “scientific” ramblings (“hypotheses”) about man’s so-called “evolution,” which were being bandied about at the time. And perhaps, this is what had led Shelley to create Dr. Frankenstein and his monster, a warning, perhaps? It would be only eight years after Mary Shelley’s death that Darwin’s Zionist-ordered neurotic-nightmare, The Origin of Species, would be published.
In my estimation, Shelley’s novel was, and still is, prophetic, as the following article reveals:
Genetic programming for the Brave New Utopia
by Jon Rappoport
January 23, 2015
First, read these two quotes from highly regarded academic scientists, to catch the flavor of the genetic revolution. Be prepared for staggering pronouncements.
From Lee Silver, Princeton, molecular biologist and author of Remaking Eden:
“The GenRich—who account for ten percent of the American population—[will] all carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class…
“Naturals work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee.
“Many think that it is inherently unfair for some people to have access to technologies that can provide advantages while others, less well-off, are forced to depend on chance alone, [but] American society adheres to the principle that personal liberty and personal fortune are the primary determinants of what individuals are allowed and able to do.
“Indeed, in a society that values individual freedom above all else, it is hard to find any legitimate basis for restricting the use of repro[grammed]-genetics. I will argue [that] the use of reprogenetic technologies is inevitable. [W]hether we like it or not, the global marketplace will reign supreme.”
Here is another gem, from Gregory Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine:
“Even if half the world’s species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms—some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two—burst onto the scene. We best serve ourselves, as well as future generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future.”
One scientist says we might lose half of all species getting where we “want to go,” genetically speaking, and the other says the process will inevitably be guided by wealth and the free market, thus creating two distinct classes of humans, the higher of which has far superior abilities—and they’ll run things.
Aren’t you thrilled? If your children make it through, they may turn out to be half-biological, half-technological.
Plexiglass head, two cameras for eyes, titanium feet. Whatever.
They were aiming to become the next Mozart? And instead they wound up burning down half the city? Just a glitch in the research. Take the long view. Don’t worry, be happy.
The debate comes down to who controls, yes, the philosophy. Not the science. Is each human merely and only a system, or is he something more, inhabiting a physical form?
We already know what the vast majority of brain researchers and geneticists believe, as well as the governments and corporations and universities and foundations that make important decisions.
Of course, these days, the college faculty department considered to be the least important, the most useless, a mere appendage waiting for those with wisdom to put it out of its misery and kill it off…is the philosophy department.
That leaves us to take up the philosophic argument.
Not Lee Silver at Princeton or Gregory Stock or Bill Gates or George Soros or David Rockefeller or the Pope or Stephen Hawking or Obama or the Clintons or Monsanto or Dow or the Bush family or PBS or FOX or socialists or Communists or liberals or conservatives or some wackadoodle at Harvard or MIT or UCLA.
Notice this: Nowhere in the scenarios for a brave new utopia do we see mention of the human creative impulse. That’s ignored. Instead, somehow, new genes will take care of the whole issue. Those who receive the right ones will suddenly spring full-blown, as Michelangelos.
This is sheer nonsense.
The truth is, thousands and thousands of genetic experiments will continue to be performed, in the dark, based on a very small amount of knowledge. The grotesque results will be cast aside as unfortunate casualties in the march toward The New World.
DNA isn’t the key to “a better human.” Individual freedom and power are, and they launch a process of living and thinking and imagining and creating that can’t be short-circuited. Can’t be synthesized or fabricated.
The philosophy of Scientism is the current paradigm. It extrapolates from the sciences and molds political, economic, and psychological norms that propagate totalitarian societies, based on an absurd materialist view of the human.
The awareness you have, at this moment, of being alive is not a function of DNA or the brain. Nothing contained in those structures can account for such awareness. Not the atoms, the electrons, the protons, the nuclei, the quarks, mesons, wavicles…
But genetic research can be used a cover story to demand a planet with one huge underclass and a few “enlightened” rulers. Which is what is happening now. (emphasis added)
The Article Can Be Found Here:
Nikola Tesla: Instinct transcends knowledge, and human perception of truth CAN be more accurate than the conclusions drawn from logic and reason. Comprende?
Here it is, the NEW WORLD ORDER, in all of its dehumanizing, Darwinian/eugenics glory. Here it is, the slimy offspring of Darwin’s and Galton’s demonic bullshit! I have been writing about this inevitable threat to humanity for eight years. I have spoken to people about it and argued with them. And, for the most part, I have either been shunned or blown off, because most people, today, have been so indoctrinated/brainwashed with this Darwinian lie that to speak against it is to be labeled a heretic or insane.
I hope you were paying attention to what Jon Rappoport has written here? Do you understand what is happening, and what could soon happen to you, your family and the rest of us “NATURALS”? Do you understand, now, that these materialist nerds, these pocket-protecting, lab-coat wearing assholes, have been hired by the Zionist elite-pigs (“The GenRich”) to come up with not only the ways and means of creating these two separate classes of human beings, worldwide, but with the philosophical rhetoric and bald-faced lies needed to condone and legitimize this greatest of all crimes against humanity?
Do you see, now, what I mean by Mary Shelley being a prophet? Take an insane megalomaniac, who believes he/she is brilliant, and thus superior to every other human being (Dr. Sheldon Cooper-like), and then get him/her (IT) in touch with the Zionist elite-pigs, who despotically control the wealth and power in the Western nations, and you have Dr. Frankenstein and his monster all over again; only this time with the financial and political backing of the wealthy and powerful few.
Just to be fair and clarify:
The major religions amount to the second head of this two-headed monster. The Jew, Muslim and Christian, for instance, have, for all intents and purposes, the same superior, exclusive attitude as the Darwinian believer: “We have the truth and are thus, superior to those who don’t believe as we do.” Only with the Jew, Christian and Muslim, there is a supernatural entity to supposedly back up their arguments and superiority complexes. While the Darwinian believer, on the other hand, is left with a nerd-like god called “natural-selection,” or “evolution,” and two neurotic-racist prophets/saviors named Darwin and Galton: nerds are drawn to nerds, evidently, just like pigs to slop.
The crux of the matter amounts to this: if you don’t believe as the Jew, Christian, Muslim or Darwinian, then you are, in their estimation, an infidel/heathen or inbred-moron who is not worthy of life/existence, here and now or after this life/existence is over. In other words, if you’ve experienced one of these excursions into the mindless and tedious hell of religious men, then you’ve experienced all four of them. I know this, because I have had the misfortune of experiencing three of the four: Christianity, a sect of Judaism, and the Darwinian religion. I tried to be a faithful follower of these manipulative fairy-tales, but in the end, I just couldn’t bring my self to be that self-obsessed, superstitious, sheep-like and brain-dead.
Wake Up, People!