Are New Vaccine Mandates Designed to Target the Poor?

For those who don’t believe there is an Merican ‘cast system’, the following article might help to awaken you to the truth:

Are New Vaccine Mandates Designed to Target the Poor?

By Joshua Krause

Ever since the measles outbreak in Disneyland, there has been a determined effort by legislators in California, to repeal the state’s current vaccine exemptions. If they succeed, the only way parents can skip their children’s vaccinations is if there is an acceptable medical reason. As you can imagine, those who are deeply concerned over the safety and efficacy of vaccines have every reason to fear these developments.

Or do they?

Well, yes and no. No in the sense that I don’t think we are headed towards a future that forces everyone to take the jab, but the answer will likely be yes for folks who don’t have a lot of disposable income. For reasons that I will explain below, you can bet your bottom dollar that there will always be a way to avoid vaccinations for you and your family. However, it’s going to cost you.

For instance, take California’s proposed vaccine law. It doesn’t provide any harsh punishment for failing to vaccinate your children. All it says is that your child can’t attend school without the required vaccines. It doesn’t say anything about homeschooling. If you can afford to hire a personal tutor for your kids, or you make enough money to let your spouse stay home, then you can avoid this altogether.

I suspect this might become a new trend, and it won’t be restricted to the United States. In Australia, the government recently stated that if any family refuses to vaccinate their children, they will be denied medical benefits to the tune of $11,400. For a low-income family that’s a huge hit, but for the upper class that’s just a drop in the bucket.

Mind you, they didn’t say that their children will be taken by the state or their parents will be charged with child endangerment. It’s just going to cost them to keep their kids vaccine free. If these Western governments truly believed that vaccines save lives and avoiding them was dangerous, wouldn’t they be more willing to imprison parents for putting their children’s lives in danger? Their half-hearted attempts to stifle vaccine-free families, says it all.

Granted, in the future there will be some heavy-handed attempts to hurt families that don’t want to vaccinate. Earlier this year, the Washington Department of Social and Health Services threatened to take away a child because their parents didn’t want to give her a flu vaccine. However, does anyone believe that social services would take away a child from a rich family, with connections and easy access to legal help?

Do you see what I’m getting at here? They will always leave loopholes for the benefit of the elites, but those loopholes will filter out anyone who doesn’t have the cash. To some extent, this situation already exists in America. There are only two states that don’t allow any personal belief or religious exemptions: Mississippi and West Virginia, i.e. two of the poorest states in America. Somehow I doubt that the financial and political elite spend a whole lot of time in those states.

[…]

Let’s not forget that in California, private schools have significantly higher rates of vaccine non-compliance than their public school counterparts. There appears to be a large segment of America’s elite that doesn’t want to vaccinate their children. Do they know something the rest of us don’t? And given the power this class wields in our state, federal, and local governments, how much do you want to bet that before California passes this legislation, they will exempt private schools from the law?

By now, some of you might be asking yourselves why they would do this? Why would the poor be forced into this while the rich get a pass? As I mentioned before, this is a growing trend that is international in scope, and the truth of the matter may lie beyond our borders. If this story from Kenya is any indication, then these laws have a truly nefarious purpose behind them.

Independent laboratory testing has confirmed that a tetanus vaccine given to over 2.3 million young women in Kenya contained the HCG antigen.

HCG was developed by the WHO as a long-term contraceptive. It causes the body to attack a fetus through an antibody response, and can cause spontaneous abortions for 3 years after the woman is injected with the drug.

Dr. Muhame Ngare of Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi said:

We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen. They were all laced with HCG.

This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.

To me, it looks like these laws have all the trappings of a eugenics agenda. Do you honestly still believe these vaccines are safe? (emphasis added)

Read the entire article and links here:

via Activist Post: Are New Vaccine Mandates Designed to Target the Poor?.

Note:

To me, it looks like these laws have all the trappings of a eugenics agenda. Do you honestly still believe these vaccines are safe?

And eugenics rears it elitist, racist and bigoted head once again. The ‘not fit for life’ masses, or the not ‘well born’ masses, are being preyed upon by the elite few who hold all the wealth and political power. It’s the same old ancient story that never seems to have an ending, because the ‘not fit for life’ masses let it continue on and on…!

Well, Mr and Ms Merica, do you honestly believe these vaccines are safe? If you do, then can you explain to me why many doctors, and others of the wealthy/wealthy elite class, refuse to allow their children to be vaccinated? Honestly, think about it! Why would the wealthy/wealthy elite withhold their children from being vaccinated, if the vaccines were truly as ‘effective’ and ‘safe’ as the government, Big Pharma and the AMA claim? There are many doctors who coerce their patients into being vaccinated, and yet these same doctors will not be vaccinated themselves. Why is this, Mr and Ms Merica, if vaccines are ‘effective’ and ‘safe’?

Thus, it would appear that these vaccines are only ‘effective’ and ‘safe’ for the disenfranchised poor class in Merica, and the rest of the world as well. Kind of sounds fishy to me, how about you, Mr and Ms Merica?

It appears to me that we now have a true ‘cast system’ in Merica: there is the wealthy/wealthy elite class, and then there is the disenfranchised poor class, which includes everyone else. Those in the wealthy/wealthy elite class can, and do, refuse to be vaccinated, while the disenfranchised poor class is coerced into being vaccinated.

I wonder what happened to the “all men are created equal” bullshit?

4 thoughts on “Are New Vaccine Mandates Designed to Target the Poor?

  1. “Their actions reveal their true nature”

    Actions speak louder than words! And old adage, but a true one.

    Yes, equality, like freedom and political rights, is the carrot dangled in front of the harnessed mule. Equality, freedom and political rights are dangled, by our masters holding the reigns, right in front of our eyes, but just far enough in front that we’ll never quite reach them.

    The only way to have equality, freedom and rights is for the people to destroy that which binds them and take back what is rightfully theirs! Until that time comes, if ever, these terms will remain what they are, manipulative lies, just as you point out!

    Feeling any better today?

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.