Here is an excellent article on one of the primary [diabolical] reasons vaccines are being foisted on we the individuals and our children:
Vaccines: an ideal covert op to genetically re-engineer humans
Why is the government so maniacal about injecting vaccines?
by Jon Rappoport
July 11, 2015
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)
The reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:
“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”
“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”
“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.”
“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”
Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”
Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.” Alteration of the human genetic makeup. Not just a “visit.” “Permanent residence.”
The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:
“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”
Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.
Let’s take this further. Under the cover of preventing disease (and all good covert ops float a laudatory goal to conceal their true intent), vaccines are ideal carriers for all sorts of genes that would be permanently incorporated into the human structure.
The enormous tonnage of propaganda about vaccines, and the resultant mandatory laws that enforce vaccination (without fear of liability), create a powerful channel along which re-engineering is eminently possible.
Synthetic genes injected into billions of humans would form a grand experiment to create an altered species. Some of this is happening already, but the Times article presents a much fuller picture of what is approaching on the immediate horizon.
This grand experiment will be compartmentalized. For example, secretly, genes 1-6 will be injected into Group A in geo-location I. Genes 7-12 will be injected into Group B in location II. And so on.
Vaccine recipients will be subjected to ongoing surveillance to gauge the results. On various pretexts, members of these groups will be brought into clinics for exams and tests, to discover markers that purportedly reveal their bodies’ responses to the genetic alterations.
Are these people stronger or weaker? Do they exhibit signs of illness? Do they report behavioral changes? Through surveillance and testing, all sorts of information can be compiled.
Of course, there is no informed consent. The human guinea pigs have no knowledge of what is being done to them.
And what would be the objectives of this lunatic research program? They would vary. On a simplified level, there would be two. Create weaker and more docile and more obedient and more dependent humans. On the other side, create stronger and healthier and more intelligent and more talented humans. Obviously, the results of the latter experiments would be applied to the “chosen few.” And clearly, some of this research will be carried on inside the military. Secrecy is easier to maintain, and the aim to produce “better soldiers” is a long-standing goal of the Pentagon and its research arm, DARPA.
A global vaccine experiment of the type I’m describing here has another bonus for the planners: those people who fall ill or die can be written off as having suffered from various diseases and disorders which “have nothing to do with vaccines.” This is already SOP for the medical cartel.
The numbers of casualties, in this grand experiment, would be of no concern to the Brave New World shapers. As I’ve documented extensively, the US medical system is already killing 2.25 million people per decade (a conservative estimate), as a result of FDA-approved drugs and mistreatment in hospitals. Major media and government leaders, aware of this fact, have done nothing about it.
Here is a quote from Princeton molecular biologist, Lee Silver, the author of Remaking Eden. It gives you a window into how important geneticists are thinking about an engineered future:
“The GenRich—who account for ten percent of the American population—[will] all carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class…
“Naturals [unaltered humans] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee.
“Many think that it is inherently unfair for some people to have access to technologies that can provide advantages while others, less well-off, are forced to depend on chance alone, [but] American society adheres to the principle that personal liberty and personal fortune are the primary determinants of what individuals are allowed and able to do.
“Indeed, in a society that values individual freedom above all else, it is hard to find any legitimate basis for restricting the use of repro[grammed]-genetics. I will argue [that] the use of reprogenetic technologies is inevitable. [W]hether we like it or not, the global marketplace will reign supreme.”
Here is another gem, from Gregory Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine:
“Even if half the world’s species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms—some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two—burst onto the scene. We best serve ourselves, as well as future generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future.”
Notice that these two well-known scientists are speaking about “ethics.” It’s important to realize that a significant number of such experts have their own extremely peculiar (to say the least) version of what is right and wrong. (See also this.)
With vaccines that permanently alter human genetic makeup on the horizon, and given the corporate and government-agency penchant for secrecy, we are already inhabiting the Brave New World. It’s not a distant prospect.
Every genetic innovation is aimed at bringing us closer to a stimulus-response world, and further away from freedom.
Which is why the defense of freedom becomes ever more vital.
That struggle comes down to who controls, yes, the philosophy, not the science. Is each human merely and only a system waiting to be re-engineered, or is he something far, far more, inhabiting a physical form?
We already know what the vast majority of brain researchers and geneticists believe, as well as the governments and corporations and universities and foundations that make important decisions.
Of course, these days, the college faculty department considered to be the least important, the most useless, a mere appendage waiting for those with wisdom to put it out of its misery and kill it off…is the philosophy department.
That leaves us to take up the argument and the resistance.
Not Lee Silver at Princeton or Gregory Stock or Bill Gates or George Soros or David Rockefeller or the Pope or Stephen Hawking or Obama or the Clintons or Monsanto or Dow or the Bush family or PBS or FOX or socialists or Communists or liberals or conservatives or some wackadoodle at Harvard or MIT or UCLA.
Us. (emphasis added)
Isn’t it bad enough that Pig Pharma vaccines have been exposed as being completely ineffective, toxic and even spread the viruses they were SUPPOSEDLY concocted to prevent? But even beyond this, we the individuals are also being used as lab-rats and guinea pigs for the medical-industry “scientists” who make the vaccines (the 21st century Dr. Frankensteins), and of course, without our knowledge or consent.
Is it just me, or does this seem to be a heinous, criminal activity?
In my opinion, this type of insanity is the direct result of two religious/ideological doctrines, which are both pandered as science: evolution and eugenics.
“Even if half the world’s species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms—some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two—burst onto the scene…”
I wonder what it’s like to be a two-legged finite-god with a chemistry set?
How could any human being have become this deluded and dehumanized? Did mommy and daddy drop these self-proclaimed geniuses on their little heads as babies, or were they just born this demented, this depraved? Maybe this is the reason football jocks called them nerds and beat the hell out of them in high school?
According to these Darwinian-eugenicists, ‘natural-selection’ (Darwin’s half-baked god) has outlived its usefulness to them. Natural-selection is evidently out now, its dead, kaput, finito.
This is tantamount to Christian fundamentalists suddenly claiming their god has completed his work in them, and thus they are now, the only omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent deities in the universe: “God has been rendered obsolete by our great works! We “the chosen” will take it from here and complete our spiritual perfection!”
On an old blog of mine, a rabid Darwinian once proclaimed, “Everyone knows that evolution has completed its work!” When I answered, “So then, are you saying you are the end result, the pinnacle, of evolutionary creation?” His response was, “Yes, evolution has completed its work in evolved man!” And so I asked, “And how do you know this? Where is your evidence?” He then responded (something to the effect), “All one has to do is look at the world today, to see that man, through his technology, as just one example, has no need of naturally evolving any further! From here forward, man himself will control his own evolution!”
And the illusion/delusion continues on. And yet the Darwinian faithful will froth at the mouth when they hear a Christian spewing his/her spiritual “fairy tales.” The accomplished hypocrite is always the last to recognize his/her own blatant hypocrisy.
Over the years, I have come to understand, through experiences like these, that, just as with bible-thumping Christians, asking the Darwinian faithful for evidence of what they are spewing out as fact will only get me more unsubstantiated, faith-based, hypothetical/ideological bullshit. What the Darwinian, like his/her hated Christian counterpart, is most ‘evolved’ at is answering a question with a question, or making up his/her doctrine of faith, his/her “scientific” fairy tale, as he/she goes along: ducking/dodging difficult and hazardous-to-their-doctrine questions is the Darwinian’s greatest accomplishment:
“None are as blind as those who will not see.” John Heywood (1546)
I have found this kind of interaction with the Darwinian faithful to be very much like attempting to get a spoiled child to admit he/she was guilty of a wrongdoing; in other words, it’s useless, a complete waste of time and energy. In fact, a spoiled child is much more capable of being reasoned with than these eugenics-loving On the Origin of Species thumpers.
These lab-coated, pocket-protecting ‘scientists’ have become so megalomaniacal that they now believe themselves to be finite gods. And evidently, you and I simply exist to serve as these finite gods’ guinea-pigs and lab-rats.
Here are two more excellent articles on this issue. I would encourage women, in particular, to check these articles out, especially those who are still sexually active and desire to be mothers: