U.S. Government Sources State: “…U.S. Policy is Known to Create Terrorists.”

What elite owned and operated entity creates terrorists, “homegrown” or otherwise, and then openly admits it? The U.S. Corporation, evidently.

Insanity is the order of the day, when it comes to the American government and most Americans!

Center for a Stateless Society » Obama Suspends TV Coverage of Middle East

Sheldon Richman | @SheldonRichman

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security announced today that the government will forbid the television news media from covering the conflict in the Middle East because “displays of U.S. military operations there have the potential to radicalize Americans against the Obama administration’s foreign policy and provoke terrorism in the United States.”

“In these dangerous times we can no longer stand by while graphic accounts of U.S. military action and the Islamic State’s growth inspire impressionable young people to commit violence in misguided acts vengeance,” Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said in a joint statement.

“We have worked hard to shut off propaganda channels, such as websites and Twitter accounts, but we have concluded that this will never be enough to adequately address the problem. Frankly, the media’s very coverage of U.S. policy in Syria, Iraq, and elsewhere, despite good intentions, functions as a recruiting tool for the Islamic State and al-Qaeda. So after much consideration, we are taking this admittedly drastic step to safeguard the homeland.”

Civil-liberties organizations immediately lodged a protest. “This outrageous action violates the First Amendment and America’s best traditions of freedom of speech and press,” stated an ad hoc coalition of groups assembled spontaneously in the wake of the government’s announcement. “If the government’s activities provoke terrorism, that is not the news media’s fault. Perhaps the government needs to reevaluate its policies. We are confident that the American people will not stand for this restriction on freedom and that the courts will vindicate our most cherished liberties.”

Government sources, who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to speak on the matter, said the action was felt necessary because U.S. policy is known to “create terrorists.”

According to one source, “Government studies and top military leaders have repeatedly acknowledged that America’s invasion and occupation of Iraq, bombing of multiple Muslim countries, and unconditional support for Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians have worked effectively to recruit men and women into the ranks of violent Islamic extremists. More than one top official has estimated that 10 terrorists are created for every one killed.”

Another source said, “We are very concerned about self-radicalized terrorists, lone wolves who sit in their homes in the United States and communicate with no one while plotting violent acts inside the United States. Our FBI informants keep tabs on some of these people, but a few fall through the cracks. To the extent that television news coverage portrays U.S. policy in action, it can’t help but motivate violent resistance. We wish it were otherwise, but that’s just the way it is. We cannot ignore this undeniable fact.”

A third source added, “It would be unreasonable to expect U.S. bombing of hospitals and wedding parties in Muslim countries, however well-intentioned, not to ‘radicalize’ some people against our policies. So the least we can do is to avoid inflaming home-grown terrorism. The president’s decision is aimed at that objective.”

Out of concern for the people who would lose their jobs because of the president’s action, the State and Defense Departments said network correspondents would be given positions in a new Committee on Public Information. “These correspondents have faithfully kept the American people informed of how the government sees the conflict in the Middle East,” a source said. “With them now working formally for the American people, their coverage can be more finely tailored to the national interest, specifically, to the need to lessen the threat of home-grown terrorism.”

The government’s action was applauded not only by conservative groups for its national-security value, but also by progressives, who are reluctant to criticize President Obama.

The presidential candidates also reacted. “The Constitution is not a suicide pact,” Ted Cruz said on the campaign trail in South Carolina. “Desperate times call for desperate measures. But President Obama should have done this long ago. We cannot afford a commander-in-chief who leads from behind.”

“President Obama would have never thought to do this if I had not raised the issue when I got into this race,” Donald Trump said. “No one was talking about homeland security and radical Islamic terrorism until I started talking about it. When I am president, we are going to win again, I can tell you that. I built a terrific company, so I know something about controlling news coverage. Obama is an amateur and a lame duck. And he’s weak. Look what he did. He had his attorney general and the homeland security secretary carry this out. As president, I’ll be strong. I wrote the bestselling The Art of the Deal, my second-favorite book after The Bible. I’ll just get the network chiefs on the phone and tell them what I want. That’s all I’ll have to do, believe me. We’re gonna start winning again.”

Jeb Bush was critical, saying Trump was a whiner. When reminded that he was being asked about the Obama administration’s gagging of TV news, not Trump, Bush referred reporters to his mother. Barbara Bush said her son is a good son and best qualified to be president.

Asked to comment, Dr. Ben Carson said that as a pediatric neurosurgeon he often had to make life-and-death decisions. He said something else, but it wasn’t audible to reporters standing close by.

John Kasich also commented, but no on can remember what he said.

Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton said she paved the way for this action when she was secretary of state. “Some people will say this is a violation of free speech. Others will say it is a violation of the free press. I say, at this point what difference does it make?”

Her rival, Bernie Sanders, expressed misgivings, asking, “How does this address rampant economic inequality and corrupt campaign finance?”

“Here’s the bottom line,” Sen. Marco Rubio said when asked about the administration’s action, “This notion that Barack Obama doesn’t know what he’s doing is just not true. He knows exactly what he’s doing.” (emphasis added)

Source: Center for a Stateless Society » Obama Suspends TV Coverage of Middle East

Did you note this quote, this bullshit rhetoric:

“If the government’s activities provoke terrorism, that is not the news media’s fault. Perhaps the government needs to reevaluate its policies. We are confident that the American people will not stand for this restriction on freedom and that the courts will vindicate our most cherished liberties.”

On what planet do these idiots live? “Perhaps the government needs to reevaluate its policies”? (“Perhaps”????!!!!) “…the American people will not stand for this restriction on freedom”? “…the courts will vindicate our most cherished liberties”?

Are you kidding me? The courts are as worthless as a maternity-ward in a nunnery! And the American people are responsible for the government believing it can get away with this kind of Big Brother totalitarianism. This government has been getting away with this kind of covert and overt tyranny for two centuries-plus!

And then there is this gem:

“It would be unreasonable to expect U.S. bombing of hospitals and wedding parties in Muslim countries, however well-intentioned, not to ‘radicalize’ some people against our policies. So the least we can do is to avoid inflaming home-grown terrorism. The president’s decision is aimed at that objective.”

“However well-intentioned”? I’m incredulous! How can the bombing of hospitals and wedding parties, the mass-murdering of ill and innocent men, women and children (‘civilians’), ever be considered “well-intentioned”? How?!

Absolute Insanity Reigns!

P.S.

After having read this article, I cannot, for the life of me, fathom how any rational individual could ever consider voting for any one of these candidates, these mindless, corrupt stooges. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel.

The decline and fall of the American Empire has taken place in my lifetime, and here is the proof.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “U.S. Government Sources State: “…U.S. Policy is Known to Create Terrorists.””

  1. You had me until this: “Out of concern for the people who would lose their jobs because of the president’s action, the State and Defense Departments said network correspondents would be given positions in a new Committee on Public Information.” Things are bad, but they’re not that bad yet. The fake quotes from the presidential candidates are funny too. Unfortunately, this humor is all too close to the truth by the day. –Paul

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Yes, I didn’t get this quote either. You’re right, this isn’t happening anytime soon.

    And yes, very close, too close!

    Thanks for the comment!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s