“Instead of Saving a Choking Three-Year-Old, McDonald’s Customers Filmed Her”

Image: http://www.thedailysheeple.com

Here is yet another example of the desensitizing/dehumanizing effect of Darwinian-eugenics indoctrination: “Why bother saving each other? After all, our earliest common ancestor was just a piece of slime that slithered out of the primordial cesspool, and our closest relative was a puke-devouring chimp.”

And then there is the yet to be recognized curse of modern technology, which has made most of us self-involved morons who can no longer think or react without consulting a fucking therapist.

In one sense, this child might have been much better off dead, since eating McDonald’s poisoned food, at this early age, is a much slower, a much crueler, way to die. And besides, the shorter the time on this hell hole planet, as it stands today, the better:

Classy: Instead of Saving a Choking Three-Year-Old, McDonald’s Customers Filmed Her


Editor’s Note: Disconnected from their humanity, much?

by Carey Wedler

In the digital age, people are increasingly attached to technology and obsessively eager to capture memorable moments on their smartphones.

This new-age phenomenon repeatedly makes headlines, often when animals are mistreated or endangered. Last year, a horde of beachgoers morbidly snapped selfies with a dead whale that washed ashore in Orange County, California. In Argentina earlier this year, a crowd of people at the beach pulled a baby dolphin from the water, taking pictures with it until it died. At a beach in Lebanon, people dragged a sea turtle from the water to take selfies before beating and abusing him.

Animals often suffer the fate of serving as props in our image-obsessed world. But a recent incident at McDonald’s shows just how far some people are willing to go to record exciting content.

When three-year-old Millie Wise began choking on a Chicken McNugget at a McDonald’s in the U.K. last week, restaurant-goers did not attempt to help her, nor did they call for help.

Instead, they pulled out their phones and started filming as she began convulsing and lost consciousness, the Mirror reported. Though they didn’t venture to take selfies with her — as humans around the world have done with suffering animals – they failed to take any action to save her life.

“It is unbelievable that people would watch a thing like that and their first instinct was not to call help but to take pictures and video,” said Claire Wise, the girl’s mother, who was not present for the incident. Millie was with her grandmother, who promptly screamed for help when she realized Millie was choking.

Fortunately, McDonald’s employees took note of the situation. One tried to dislodge the food before the shopping center medic arrived. Millie was eventually transported to a hospital.

Though she received the treatment she needed, the decision multiple McDonald’s patrons made to film a choking, suffering, and nearly dying child — rather than quickly searching for help — is easily diagnosed as a societal obsession with gaining attention, whether from friends or through social media.

{Sojourner note: and here comes the psycho-babble explanation, the bullshit excuse!}

In reality, the incident at McDonald’s demonstrates a psychological dynamic documented long before cell phones dominated the modern world — the bystander effect. As Psychology Today explains, “the bystander effect occurs when the presence of others discourages an individual from intervening in an emergency situation.”

The concept was first documented by two social psychologists, Bibb Latané and John Darley, who analyzed the murder of a woman in New York City in 1964. Though multiple bystanders observed the crime, they did not attempt to stop the murder or call the police.

“Latané and Darley attributed the bystander effect to the perceived diffusion of responsibility (onlookers are more likely to intervene if there are few or no other witnesses) and social influence (individuals in a group monitor the behavior of those around them to determine how to act).”

While the bystander effect certainly came into play at McDonald’s this weekend, it appears the decades-old theory is increasingly compounded by people’s addiction to their phones.

{Sojourner note: this author evidently genuflects anytime a PhD in psychology speaks. All hail to a notion thought up by a mother-lover a century and half ago. God damn it, why are we all such gullible sheep to the slaughter?}

“I hope the people who did use their phones to take photos and video have the decency to delete them and I hope no one will share them on social media,” Millie’s mother said. “I am disgusted that people recorded such a traumatic incident while my mam and Millie were suffering such an awful ordeal.”

{Sojourner note: if I had been the father of this child, and had been present at the time, after I had made sure my child was safe, there would have been a pile of broken techno-toys and some bloody fucking noses!}

Source: Classy: Instead of Saving a Choking Three-Year-Old, McDonald’s Customers Filmed Her | The Daily Sheeple


2 thoughts on ““Instead of Saving a Choking Three-Year-Old, McDonald’s Customers Filmed Her””

  1. It’s beyond me to imagine how any human being could take photos when another human being, child or adult, is choking to death.

    There are no words, Carol!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s