Robots are inventing their own languages « Jon Rappoport’s Blog

Image: http://www.pinimg.com

…The AI designers and inventors and technicians tend to have their own bias. They want to believe they are creating life. They don’t want to think they are just putting together machines. That isn’t enough. The technocratic impulse involves faith in MACHINES AS LIVING ENTITIES.

Thus, we arrive at all sorts of myths and fairy tales about humans merging with machines, to arrive at a new frontier, where, for example, human brains hooked up to super-computers will result in higher consciousness and even the invocation of God.

Technocrats will say, do, and believe anything to turn machines into what machines aren’t.

They’ve crucially abandoned THEMSELVES and their own potential; so all they have left is THE MACHINE…

Dr Frankenstein is alive and insane as ever!

If you believe everything ‘science’ is pandering today, then you have a severe problem. Materialistic ‘science’ is a corporate-capitalist enterprise/concoction, and so its ‘scientists’ are simply trying to SELL you on its elite-swine owners’ and operators’ “AI/Singularity/Transhumanism” fairy-tales (nightmares); just as a used car lot salesmen might attempt to sell you a ‘lemon’ for an outlandish price.

Human beings are the creators of not one damn thing, including, and in particular, new life (physical or mechanical). We human beings are the cause of a great deal of the hell we experience every day, but we create nothing. We were, every last one of us, born into this creation, and so everything, including us, is part of this creation. Therefore, “there is nothing new under the sun… what is, has been before, and will be again…” The best we human beings can do is to arrange/rearrange what already exists. Or in other words, the creature can never become greater than its creator!

Legitimate artists understand this. For example: years ago, Barry Manilow wrote a song entitled, I Am Music (I write the Songs). Manilow was blasted by the critics for the title and lyrics. But Manilow wasn’t referring to himself, when he wrote this song. Like many artistically gifted people, Manilow understood that it was the music that had resided in him, from conception, that had written the songs.

I am a ‘classically’ trained composer, but I do not create the music: I did not create melody, harmony or rhythm, I simply use melody, harmony and rhythm to compose the music that resonates in my mind and heart’s ear: much as the sculptor sees an object/subject in whatever medium (bronze, clay, stone, etc) he is using, and then, utilizing his skills as a sculptor, extricates the object/subject from that particular medium. Every note and combination of notes in my compositions have, to some lesser or greater degree, been used, many times over, by composers who lived before me and those who live now.

As the twentieth century composer, Igor Stravinsky, once stated, in regards to his composition, The Rite of Spring:

“I was merely the vessel through which La Sacre flowed.”

On the complete opposite side of this sanity, life and truth, slithers the corporate-capitalist owned and operated ‘scientists’ of today; who have become so lacking in anything resembling a human being that, being imprisoned in their deep-thinking induced insanity and materialistic-science/atheism (Scientism), they now erroneously believe they are creators of what they simply MAKE/PRODUCE (arrange/rearrange) in a laboratory. These so called scientists truly and insanely believe they are two-legged mortal-gods.

The good news is, the truth is being heard once again, and so these neo-Frankenstein’s days are numbered. These “scientific experts” and “geniuses” cried wolf once too often, and now more and more people are starting to turn a deaf ear to their insane bullshit:

Robots are inventing their own languages

The programming and design of artificial intelligence

by Jon Rappoport

July 14, 2017

Along with assurances that we’re facing an imminent takeover of industrial production by robots and other artificial intelligence (AI), we’re also being told that AI can develop its own systems of communication and operation, without help from humans.

Here is a sprinkling of quotes from the mainstream and technical press:

The Atlantic, June 15, 2017: “When Facebook designed chatbots to negotiate with one another, the bots made up their own way of communicating.”

Tech Crunch, November 22, 2016: “Google’s AI translation tool seems to have invented its own secret internal language.”

Wired, March 16, 2017: “It Begins: Bots Are Learning to Chat in Their Own Language.”

The suggestion is: AI can innovate. It can size up situations and invent unforeseen and un-programmed strategies, in order to accomplish set goals.

Who benefits from making such suggestions? Those companies and researchers who want to make the public believe AI is quite, quite powerful, and despite the downside risks (AI takes over its own fate), holds great promise for the human race in the immediate future. “Don’t worry, folks, we’ll rein in AI and make it work for us.”

Beyond that, the beneficiaries are technocratic Globalists who are in the process of bringing about a new society in which AI is intelligent and prescient enough to regulate human affairs at all levels. It’s the science fiction “populations ruled by machines” fantasy made into fact.

“AI doesn’t just follow orders. It sees what humans can’t see, and it runs things with greater efficiency.”

Let’s move past the propaganda and state a few facts.

AI is not running its own show.

It isn’t innovating.

It isn’t creating its own languages.

It isn’t doing any of that.

AI operates within the parameters its human inventors establish.

Any honest AI designer will tell you that.

If, for example, an AI system is given a goal and a set of “options” for achieving the goal, AI will select which option is best ACCORDING TO STANDARDS ITS HUMAN OPERATORS HAVE PROGRAMMED INTO THE SYSTEM.

Think of it this way: AI is given a set of options; but it is also given instructions on how to select what is presumably the most effective option. So AI is bounded.

There is no choice. There is no freedom. AI isn’t “jumping ship.”

“We gave our robot Charlie the task of getting from Chicago to New York. The whole plan was laid out as a vast hiking trip, with internal street maps built in. But then Charlie suddenly took a cab to O’Hare and boarded a United jet for JFK…”

No he didn’t.

AI performs as it is programmed to perform, within set parameters.

[…]

Behind all this, the fact remains that, no matter how many complex layers of “decision-making” are programmed into AI, the machine is always acting within rules and guidelines laid out in advance. It is never choosing.

Individual humans are capable of free choice, and are also capable of changing their own rules and standards.

Humans are free to say they aren’t free, as well, if they want to.

Let me make a psychological point here. There are many people who want to dominate relationships. They want to be in charge. They will want robots. They will want sophisticated robots THAT SEEM TO BE CHOOSING TO COMPLY WITH THEIR EVERY WISH AND DEMAND. These people will believe the robots are real and alive and human, in order to fulfill a fantasy in which they have found partners who want to go along with their agenda.

This is a pretty good definition of psychosis.

The AI designers and inventors and technicians tend to have their own bias. They want to believe they are creating life. They don’t want to think they are just putting together machines. That isn’t enough. The technocratic impulse involves faith in MACHINES AS LIVING ENTITIES.

Thus, we arrive at all sorts of myths and fairy tales about humans merging with machines, to arrive at a new frontier, where, for example, human brains hooked up to super-computers will result in higher consciousness and even the invocation of God.

Technocrats will say, do, and believe anything to turn machines into what machines aren’t.

They’ve crucially abandoned THEMSELVES and their own potential; so all they have left is THE MACHINE…

Read More Here:

Source: Robots are inventing their own languages « Jon Rappoport’s Blog

Advertisements