Harvey Clinton, I mean Bill Weinstein « Jon Rappoport’s Blog

Image: http://www.truthfeed.com

I’ve been waiting for the right article to post on this subject, and here it is. These Hollywood talking heads make me sick, with their phony concern and hyperbole. Where have these oh so concerned Hollywood types been for the last two decades or more, as male actor after male actor spoke out about being molested and/or raped by these Zionist owned and operated Hollywood barons? Where have these Hollywood “heroes” been all these years, knowing that Weinstein and other Hollywood predators were raping and molesting them and other women (see here and here)? Where were these Hollywood hypocrites, when Bill Clinton was being exposed for the Weinstein type predator he is and has always been?

This Weinstein shit is not news! Hell, Hollywood has been pandering “the casting couch” scenario in movies, since I was a child. Much fucking ado about nothing, is my view of this false flag like event. If one wants to be a rich and famous Hollywood type, then there is a price to pay. It’s been that way for decades now, so why all the fuss? Evidently, Harvey W pissed off his Zionist brothers, and now they are getting him back, this is my take on the subject.

And what about Jimmy Kimmel and “The Man Show” he once co-hosted? Talk about the degrading and exploitation of women, Kimmel made Benny Hill look like Gloria Steinem. And yet, Kimmel is now running his hypocritical mouth as though he has always been as pure as the driven snow, when it comes to the subjugation, degredation and rape/molestation of women.

And then there is Michael Jackson, another Hollywood sacred cow, where was the angst and horror over Michael’s indiscretions with Children? Nowhere to be found, at least not among the Hollywood crowd. And what about Mike Tyson, a convicted rapist? And yet, I see Tyson on the boob tube quite often. Where is the angst and horror over Tyson?

Hypocrites and Liars make Hollywood the mediocre and perverse garbage heap it is today!

These Hollywood starlets aren’t “heroes”, as many are claiming now, nor are their male counterparts. These Hollywood harlots put up with Harvey Weinstein and ASSociates’ actions for years, in order to get where they are today. And now, all these years/decades later, they are finally speaking up (whining) about having to have paid “the price” for their “success”? A true female hero would have raised holy hell the minute the crime had taken place; she would have squealed like a stuck pig, to the press and her attorneys, in order to save other female actors from the same fate.

No guts, no glory, Hollywood femme-fatale “heroes”! You’ll get no sympathy from me, since most of you were more than PAID IN FULL for giving “IT” up, unlike other not-so-famous prostitutes!

Harvey Clinton, I mean Bill Weinstein

by Jon Rappoport

October 15, 2017

Now that everyone in Hollywood is taking such a brave stance after 20 years and pointing an accusing finger at Harvey Weinstein (cue massive applause and bravos), perhaps we should review Hillary Clinton’s attitude toward women who claim they were abused, attacked, and raped.

Hillary, too, was “disgusted” to learn about Weinstein’s outrageous crimes. Of course, thinking she is still on the campaign trail, she took the opportunity to equate Weinstein and Donald Trump. She somehow forgot about her own hubby Bill. When reminded, she says all that is in the past and it’s “already been litigated.” Which is lawyer talk for “we got away with it.”

Let’s see. Here are a few choice bits culled from dailywire.com:

In 1992, Hillary describes one of Bill’s women, Gennifer Flowers, as “some failed cabaret singer who doesn’t even have much of a résumé to fall back on.” She says, if given the chance to cross-examine Flowers in court, “I mean, I would crucify her.”

Hillary on Monica Lewinsky: “narcissistic loony toon.”

Hillary, while practicing as a lawyer, defends a man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl. She wins the case. Then on tape, she’s caught saying, “He [her client] took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.” Then she breaks up laughing.

Hillary talking about Weinstein has the moral high ground of a dump truck unloading toxic chemicals in a landfill.

Lest we forget, there is this, from Zero Hedge (1/25/17, via Disobedient Media): “…the shocking discovery that Hillary and Bill Clinton provided assistance to convicted child trafficker, Laura Silsby, resulting in a reduced sentence for child trafficking.”

“Silsby was arrested at the Haitian border attempting to smuggle 33 children out of Haiti without documentation. Her sentence and charges were reduced after an intervention by Bill Clinton.”

“Hillary and Bill Clinton took an extraordinary interest in Silsby’s case from the moment she was arrested and almost immediately stepped in on her behalf. The Harvard Human Rights Journal stated that one of Bill Clinton’s first acts as special envoy for the United Nations in Haiti ‘was to put out the fire of a child abduction scandal involving American citizens.’ On February 7th, 2010, The Sunday Times reported that Bill Clinton had intervened to strike a deal with the Haitian government, securing the release of all co-conspirators except for Silsby. Prosecutors ultimately sought a six-month sentence in Silsby’s case, reducing charges for conspiracy and child abduction to mere ‘arranging irregular travel.’ A shockingly light penalty given the circumstances of her arrest, which would likely not have been possible but for the intervention of the Clintons in Silsby’s case.”

Even assuming Hillary did not directly intervene in the case, what about her husband Bill? What does Hillary have to say about him?

I believe it would be: It’s all in the past, it’s already been litigated—we got away with it.

For the Clintons, the present has a magical way of dissolving into the past.

After all, Bill, when questioned about sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky, defended his “I did not do it” answer with, “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”

“Is,” as in right now, as opposed to “was,” in the recent past.

I’m not committing a crime right now, so “What difference, at this point, does it make?” That’s what Hillary said when she was grilled about the Benghazi attack and how she lied about the cause.

The present magically vanishes into the past.

The Clinton way.

And when the past is brought up—that’s already been litigated.

The Clintons—pure as the driven snow.

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

Source: Harvey Clinton, I mean Bill Weinstein « Jon Rappoport’s Blog