Quotations from “The Constitution Con”, By Michael Tsarion #4

Image: http://www.izquotes.com

{Note: the first three parts can be found here}

“The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State.” — Dr. Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister

Here are more quotations that reveal how we the individuals have been CONNED by the constitution we were all programmed to worship from childhood. All of these quotations are from Michael Tsarion’s The Constitution Con.

Part 4:

Quotations from the “The Constitution Con”

Patrick Henry, long time critic of the Constitution’s drafters, also clearly foresaw the totalitarianism of the Federalists:

My great objection to this Government is, that it does not leave us the means of defending our rights; or of waging war against tyrants…Have we the means of resisting disciplined armies, when our only defense, the militia, is put into the hands of Congress? – (Speech of 5 June, 1788)

Did you ever read of any revolution in any nation, brought about by the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no power at all?…Will your Mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?…Will the oppressor ever let go of the oppressed? Was there ever an instance? Can the annals of mankind exhibit one single example, where rulers, overcharged with power, willingly let go of the oppressed? – ibid

A standing army we shall have also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny – ibid

Alfred Jay Nock summarizes the travesty and the tragedy in these words:

Nowhere in the history of the constitutional period do we find the faintest suggestion of the Declaration’s doctrine of natural rights, and we find its doctrine of popular sovereignty not only continuing in abeyance, but constitutionally estopped from ever reappearing. Nowhere do we find a trace of the Declaration’s theory of government, on the contrary, we find it expressly repudiated. The new political mechanism was a faithful replica of the old disestablished British model, but so far improved and strengthened as to be incomparably more close-working and efficient…presenting more attractive possibilities of capture and control – (Our Enemy: the State)

Nothing that governments do is new. Despots within government operate according to plans that are repeated in various ways over generations. Their control is aided and abetted by their co-conspirators in the media. The politicians and media spin doctors are instructed by overlords who control the private banks and “philanthropic” foundations.

Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment nothing can fail. Without it nothing can succeed. He who molds opinion is greater than he who enacts laws – Abraham Lincoln

In many cases the politicians, media men and bankers are themselves under the tutelage and direction of British and European aristocracy who have made the “board,” so to speak, on which the great geopolitical games are played.

The conspirators who organize the geopolitical game are cautious and do not want their true allegiances or diabolical schemes to be publicly exposed. Each group and individual conspirator knows how vulnerable they are. They know the facts about their true allegiances and agendas must never leak out to the masses at large. Their success depends upon human apathy and ignorance.

In “Red Dusk and the Morrow”…by Sir Paul Dukes, formerly Chief of the British Secret Service in Russia, we read that a Lithuanian asked a prominent Bolshevik how the regime was maintained. The answer was: “Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish brains; secondly, on Lettish and Chinese bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass stupidity of the Russian people – Denis Fahey (The Rulers of Russia)

The elitist conspirators also know that should civil unrest occur, the masses can be forced back into line by threats to their material and emotional security. The strategy is tried and true, and usually works wonders. As Ernest Hemingway explained:

The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bringa temporary prosperity and both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists.

The Trinity of Slavery. This basic diagram delineates how Atonist royals maintain world control. By way of theology and politics are human hearts and minds enslaved. Through secret societies the hierarchy of control is perpetuated and monitored. As French poet Charles Peguy wrote: “Tyranny is always better organized that freedom.”

Because of the confessions and evidence provided by intelligent, informed whistle-blowers from within religion, politics, royalty and masonry, we know a great deal about how the engines of world and mind control operate. However there are pitfalls when insiders with myopic insight and inflexible allegiances and prejudices attempt to instruct the masses as to the intricacies of oligarchic control. When it comes to exposing the dirty little secrets, and dirty big secrets of those occupying the highest levels of the Atonist power-pyramid, objectivity is essential. Photographs of their hideous visages, taken from a rickety platform constructed by their agents, will be “blurred” and inadequate, to say the least.

An alternative schemata of the pyramid of enslavement shows that sociopolitical power descends from the highest unseen level to operatives making up the elusive College of Cardinals situated in Rome and elsewhere. This level of Solar Cult agents includes the infamous Jesuit Order and so-called Illuminati. Next, a measure of power flows down to the level of the many secret societies that plague the world. Although these denominations may have a Protestant or Catholic, liberal or conservative coloring, they are all controlled by the same nefarious Luciferian cadre. From here, when necessary, sociopolitical power is loaned to the world’s ardent psychotic occult “Jews,” or more correctly Sabbateans (Luciferians). The highest echelon within this branch know that their ideology has little to do with official Judaism, as it has been put before us. They know they are the privileged descendants of ancestors who long served ancient imperial concerns, such as the Merovingians and Hapsburgs, etc. When necessary, this group lends a modicum of sociopolitical power to the lowest level of ill-informed but violent extremists of all persuasions to run amok with their fanatical ideologies, deliberately wreaking havoc and unrest, so higher agendas are not uncovered and thwarted.

Philosopher Ayn Rand frequently warned readers about the evils of big government:

Instead of being a protector of man’s rights, the government is becoming their most dangerous violator; instead of guarding freedom the government is establishing slavery; instead of protecting men from the initiators of physical force, the government is initiating physical force and coercion in any manner and issue it pleases; instead of serving as the instrument of objectivity in human relationships, the government is creating a deadly subterranean reign of uncertainty and fear…instead of protecting men from injury by whim, the government is arrogating to itself the power of unlimited whim, so that we are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.

Rand laid it on the line when addressing the crimes of government:

Criminals are a small minority in any age or community. And the harm they have dome to mankind is infinitesimal when compared to the horrors – the bloodshed, the wars, the persecution, the famines, the enslavements, the wholesale destruction – perpetrated by mankind’s governments. Potentially, a government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights – When unlimited and unrestricted by individual rights, a government is men’s deadliest enemy.

Before her perceptive words were written, French philosopher Pierre Joseph Proudhon addressed the “people versus government” problem:

To be Governed is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so. To be Governed is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored. That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality – (General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century)

Victorian philosopher Herbert Spencer pondered whether man requires governments at all:

What, then, do they (Humans) want a government for? Not to regulate commerce; not to educate the people; not to teach religion; not to administer charity; not to make roads and railways; but simply to defend the natural rights of man – to protect person and property – to prevent the aggressions of the powerful upon the weak – in a word, to administer justice. This is the natural, the original, office of a government. It was not intended to do less: it ought not to be allowed to do more – (The Man Versus the State)

He also wrote:

The great political superstition of the past was the divine right of kings. The great political superstition of the present is the divine right of parliaments.

Father of the Anarchist movement, Mikhail Bakunin – who spent many years imprisoned in dungeons – knew all about government oppression. For him governments were unnecessary institutions that darkened the world:

The liberty of man consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature, because he has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or divine, collective or individual – (God and the State, 1882)

German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche understood why governments exist, and how they maintain their malignant dominion:

…a fullness of state power such as only despotism had enjoyed…surpassed all the past because it strove for the formal annihilation of the individual…Once the earth is brought under all-embracing economic control, then mankind will find it has been reduced to machinery in its service, as a monstrous clockwork system of ever smaller, more finely adjusted wheels.

Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega Y Gasset explained State corruption in these words:

This is the gravest danger that today threatens civilization: State intervention, the absorption of all spontaneous social effort by the State, that is to say, of spontaneous historical action, which in the long-run sustains, nourishes and impels human destinies.

His sentiments were shared by the American critic Henry L. Menken, who said the Federal State:

…has spread out its powers until they penetrate to every act of the citizen, however secret, it has begun to throw around its operations the high dignity and impeccability of a State religion, its agents become a separate and superior caste, with authority to bind and loose…But it still remains, as it was in the beginning, the common enemy of all well-disposed industrious and decent men.

In his important book on State totalitarianism, Our Enemy: the State, Albert Jay Nock explained the motives of State officials:

It is unfortunately none too well understood that, just as the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its own. All power it has is what society gives it, plus what it confiscates from time to time on one pretext or another; there is no other source from which State power can be drawn. Therefore every assumption of State power, whether by gift or seizure, leaves society with so much less power; there is never, nor can be, any strengthening of State power without a corresponding and roughly equivalent depletion of social power.

Nock understands that there is not a jot of difference between American Federalists and the diabolical Socialists who have plagued the world. He put the matter plainly:

The superficial distinctions of Fascism, Bolshevism, Hitlerism, are the concern of journalists and publicists, the serious student sees in them only one root-idea of a complete conversion of social power to State power…The positive testimony of history is that the State invariably had its origin in conquest and confiscation. No known State known to history originated in any other manner.

[…]

Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience…Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem – Howard Zinn

Americans don’t care about politics, only about politicians – Anthony Wedgwood Benn

The Articles of Confederation worked to bring security to all Americans. They restored order after the chaos of the War of Independence. Unlike the US Constitution, the Articles of Confederation honored the rights of individual States.

The Articles did not distinguish between rich and poor. They were meant for Citizens, not “People,” and did not permit an oligarchy to assume totalitarian control. The men who drafted and ratified the US Constitution were hungry for power over human beings. They adamantly wanted to protect their own prestige and wealth. Despite their megalomania they knew what they wanted and how to go about getting it. They acted like proverbial wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Their Constitution is deceptive in form and substance. It allowed an aristocracy to preside in America. The American-based aristocrats may not wear crowns or sit upon thrones, but they are in many cases directly related or connected to royal dynasties of Britain and Europe.

George W. Bush is for example a distant cousin of John Kerry, the presidential nominee who ran against him in 2004. Kerry’s parents are not Irish but Jewish. On the matter of his aristocratic ancestry we read:

Senator John Kerry has blue blood from all the royal houses of Europe, with even more titled relations than President Bush…Burke’s Peerage, which researches the genealogy, said the Democratic presidential candidate traces descent through his mother, Rosemary Forbes, to the royal houses of Albania, England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Russia, Byzantium, Persia (Iran) and France. Forbes was descended from William Forbes, the Laird of Newe, and extended family that included many baronets…It is via this family that the Democratic candidate is descended from Henry II, the king of England and father of Richard the Lionheart, who was the leader of the third Crusade in 1189…By contrast, Bush is related to Queen Elizabeth II, twenty British dukes and many European princes…President Bush, Princess Diana and Winston Churchill are distantly related – (Union Jack Newspaper; September 2000 Edition)

George H. W. Bush and wife Barbara are related to the same British oligarchs. Additionally, George is:

…closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne – and has kinship with every member of Britain’s royal family, the House of Windsor. He is the 13th cousin of Britain’s Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth, and is the 13th cousin once removed of the heir to the throne, Prince Charles. Bush’s family tree can be documented as far back as the early 15th century. He has a direct descent from Henry III and from Henry VIII’s sister Mary Tudor who was also the wife of Louis XI of France. He is also descended from Charles II of England – David Icke (Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster)

Father George and wife Barbara are both descendants of Godfroi de Bouillon who, in 1099, led European noblemen in the successful Crusade to recapture Jerusalem from the Islamic faith and moved into the King’s palace at Temple Mount…Godfroi de Bouillon was the first king of Jerusalem and the Duke of Lower Lorraine, a major region for the Illuminati bloodline – ibid

The time has come for the veils of mystique to be torn away from the so-called “Fathers” of the Constitution. They were not champions of a free, sovereign nation, and their legacy is neither auspicious nor grand. They chose to subvert the Articles that guaranteed freedom to every American. They coveted power and made themselves fabulously rich by exploiting the gullibility and ignorance of the moral but illiterate, masses. In our time their villainous counterparts in government have shifted into overdrive. Their heinous acts of conquest, extortion and confiscation know no bounds. As long as ignorance of the enemy’s nature persists, nothing will change, and the pirates of Capitol Hill will continue to ply their insidious trade. As King George once demanded, the war against America was to be waged eternally. His desire is being fulfilled as every day passes. Unless the Machiavellian intrigues of his biological and ideological descendants are exposed and overcome, America’s ruin is certain. The task is, however, impossible without knowledge of the adversary. Knowledge is the weapon we must use to eradicate the imperious predators that lurk behind the long grass. of history.

“Conspiracy!” One of the darkest words in the language of man. Yet there is hardly a single page of History that does not partially reveal the deadly eye of Conspiracy at work. It was a conspiracy that lead Brutus against Caesar in the Roman senate on the Ides of March…that plotted the betrayal of West Point by Benedict Arnold, during the American Revolution…that led John Wilkes Booth to the assassination of President Lincoln on Good Friday 1865. The past record of man is burdened with accounts of assassinations, secret combines, palace plots and betrayals in war. But in spite of this clear record, an amazing number of people have begun to scoff at the possibility of conspiracy at work today. They dismiss such an idea merely as a conspiratorial view – G. Edward Griffin (The Capitalist Conspiracy)

Knowledge of the enemy is the golden key that opens the gate to a future free of tyranny and slavery. We not only owe our children a freer future – we owe it to our forebears. Those who fought and labored to create the elements of civilization we enjoy, but who were treacherously undermined and robbed, must be remembered and reverently toasted. It is their memory we honor, not that of their destroyers.

Where other men have skimmed the surface, Beard has gone through to the core. He stayed months in Washington to get to the core. In his search for ancient papers and documents in the Treasury Department, he went into vaults that were so filled with dust that it was necessary to excavate the papers with a vacuum cleaner. But when he came back to the surface he had damning evidence against a good many of the “patriot fathers.” He then knew why they were so anxious, not only for a new constitution, but for the particular kind of a constitution that was afterward adopted – Allan L. Benson (The Dishonest Constitution)

The entire text can be found here:

Source: The Constitution Con – michaeltsarion

Once again, if any American can read this and still have faith in the government and constitution, then I have to question his or her ability to reason, sanely!