“World’s 76 Best Tide Gauges Show ‘Negligible’ Acceleration Of Sea Level Rise”

Also see:

Listening to climate doomsters makes our situation worse:

Summary: Climate science shows how America assimilates information, assesses threats, and allocate resources. We do it poorly. Doomsters are part of the problem. We can make the climate policy debate better informed and less divisive by ignoring doomsters.

“Civilization, in fact, grows more and more maudlin and hysterical; especially under democracy it tends to degenerate into a mere combat of crazes; the whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.”
— From J. L. Mencken’s In Defense of Women (1918).

{Sojourner note: Attention, panicked sheep to the slaughter, take note of this quote and article. You are being played like every sucker that ever lived, because you are panicked by your own fucking shadow!}

[…]

…what about those confident predictions?

Scientists making confident predictions about climate seldom mention the many false predictions. We have seen false predictions of “the end of winter.” False predictions that the California drought (now over) would be permanent (or very long). False predictions of more and stronger hurricanes since Katrina in 2005. False predictions about the melting of the Arctic Ocean. Despite the almost daily hype, most forms of extreme weather have not increased (esp. see Judith Curry’s new essay about this). See more failed predictions. These have, logically, eroded the public’s confidence so that climate change is ranked low among American’s public policy priorities (e.g., surveys by Gallup and Pew Research).

Some climate scientists have warned about excessive confidence. Such as Judith Curry in her articles and presentations about the need to better appreciate uncertainty (e.g., here, here, and here). They have been ignored…

[…]

A common element to these doomster stories.

A common element in these doomster stories is that the loudest warnings came after solutions were found. In most cases, the doomsters were panicking long after cooler people had seen the threat and begun preventive actions. There are structural reasons for that.

First, doomsters often believe they are smarter and know more than everybody else. Experts, politicians, administrators – none can compare with doomsters’ opinions of themselves. Second, doomsters tend to be attention whores. They play upon the public’s fears, which appear in the late stage of a challenge. By then, experts often have been working on solutions for many years. Or prices have moved to signal the need for action, which impel research and investments. Doomsters seldom see any of this, with their eyes fixed on the one true vision of the future…

House Democrats Spread ‘Lies’ About Climate Change And Hurricanes, Scientist Says:

* House Democrats published “inaccurate” climate change claims on a committee website, according to a scientist.

* Democrats based the “inaccurate” claim on information posted online by environmental activists.

* “This is not in accord with current science or consensus anywhere = fraud,” the scientist said.

House Democrats’ climate change hearing is based on “inaccurate” information that’s “not in accord with current science or consensus,” according to a scientist.

A Committee on Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee will hold a hearing Tuesday on natural disaster policy “in the wake of climate change.” However, Democrats are under fire for making claims on the hearing’s webpage that don’t line up with the facts.

Atmospheric scientist Ryan Maue, a hurricane expert, tweeted that the Democrats’ hearing “spreads lies” about the scientific consensus on climate change and hurricanes. The House subcommittee is chaired by California Rep. Harley Rouda and includes Green New Deal champion New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a member.

Maue pointed out that major scientific assessments cast doubt on claims global warming is increasing hurricane frequency or intensity…

It’s snowing in Yellowstone—on the first day of summer?

[…]

As of Friday, it’s officially summer in Yellowstone, and all manner of animals are out, breeding, eating grass, hunting, running, lounging, menacing, cowering, playing, rejoicing. Yellowstone is alive. And guess what? It’s snowing!

That’s right. The weather forecast had warned of snow and temperatures as low as 30 degrees Fahrenheit on the summer solstice, the unofficial first day of summer. Sure enough, we’ve got eight inches of fresh powder here in southwestern Montana, an hour from the entrance to the national park in West Yellowstone.

Though it may seem surprising, such extreme weather is part of the climate in Yellowstone, where snow can fall any month of the year.

Yet David Alder, an independent park guide who’s lived near West Yellowstone for 13 years, says that such a heavy snow is uncommon, happening to this degree maybe once every five years.

“But we’ll get a skiff of snow every month, just a slight bit—one or two inches that will melt off quickly,” he says. But “this is heavy and thick and this is sticking… this will wreak havoc on a lot of tourists right now…”’

Wrong again, Al Gore and klan. You pathetic liars, you frauds. Gore once claimed that Manhattan would be under twenty feet of ocean water by 2014, or five years ago. And guess what, Manhattan is still high and dry. What happened, Al? Where is all that ‘catastrophic ocean rise’ today? Al, you ever heard of the ‘boy who cried wolf’ proverb/tale? You might want to read it and take notes.

Al, I have another suggestion: Why don’t you go back to your old job, you know, cleaning ‘inconvenient’ cum stains from Billy Clinton’s zipper area, or even ‘satisfying’ him yourself? Or better yet, why don’t you and your eugenics/depopulation-driven klan just shut the fuck up and slither back into the hole you came from!

World’s 76 Best Tide Gauges Show ‘Negligible’ Acceleration Of Sea Level Rise

ANDREW CHEETHAM

‘A new scientific paper affirms “all the long-term-trend (LTT) tide gauges of the world consistently show a negligible acceleration since the time they started recording in the late 1800s/early 1900s” and there is “no sign of climate models predicted sharply warming and accelerating sea level rise.”

An accurate determination of sea level rise acceleration trends requires at least 100 years of data due to the natural (60- to 80-year) oscillations that could bias the results depending on the start and end dates.

There are 88 world tide gauges with a record length of at least 100 years in the psmsl.org database. Of those, 76 have no data quality issues.

The average rate of sea level rise for these 76 global-scale tide gauges is just 0.337 millimeters per year (mm/yr), and the acceleration is a “negligible” 0.007 mm/yr².’

Source – Investment Watchblog

Sources and links can be found here:

https://www.davidicke.com/article/543116/worlds-76-best-tide-gauges-show-negligible-acceleration-sea-level-rise